Difference between revisions of "WikiProject stuff/WikiProject mainpage/Assessment"

A fragment of the Garden of Remembering
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Let's just put this here so nothing gets forgottenlike)
 
(Hmm.)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{DISPLAYTITLE: WikiProject Old Ones article assessment}}{{:WikiProject_stuff/template}}</noinclude>{{#CSS:
.wp-assessmentslist .wp-columnlist-item {
flex: 1 0%;
min-width: 30em;
}
}}
<pre>
<pre>
EXPLANATORY BLURB
EXPLANATORY BLURB
Line 11: Line 17:
STUFF RELATEDISH (categories that would help with workflow?)
STUFF RELATEDISH (categories that would help with workflow?)
</pre>
</pre>
== Assessments ==
[TABLE]
<div class="wp-columnlist wp-assessmentslist">
<div class="wp-columnlist-item">
==== Assess for quality ====
These articles are of unknown quality and require eyes. Just not too many eyes. If you find other eyes on the articles, especially too many, just back away. BACK AWAY.
* [[#|Giant squid]]
* [[#|Three-eyed squid]]
* [[#|Cuttlefish squid]]
* [[The eyes]]
<div class="wp-add">[[#|Full list]]</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-columnlist-item">
==== Assess for importance ====
These articles have been deemed to be within project scope, but their importance to the overall project has not yet been assessed. Please rate them according to how dire the consequences would be were they neglected.
* [[#|Aboleth]]
* [[#|Colossal squid]]
* [[#|Act of screaming]]
* [[#|Fibre]]
<div class="wp-add">[[#|Full list]]</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-columnlist-item">
==== Assess for Scope ====
These articles may or may not be in scope, and thus dangerous. Please verify.
* [[#|Gasdsthoshis]]
* [[#|Beholder (creature)]]
* [[#|Sample]]
* [[#|The Librarian]]
<div class="wp-add">[[#|Full list]]</div>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 18:08, 19 June 2015

EXPLANATORY BLURB

SHORT TABLE/LONG TABLE of current status stuff

THINGS TO ASSESS
	quality
	importance to project scope
	in scope at all

STUFF RELATEDISH (categories that would help with workflow?)


Assessments

[TABLE]

Assess for quality

These articles are of unknown quality and require eyes. Just not too many eyes. If you find other eyes on the articles, especially too many, just back away. BACK AWAY.

Assess for importance

These articles have been deemed to be within project scope, but their importance to the overall project has not yet been assessed. Please rate them according to how dire the consequences would be were they neglected.

Assess for Scope

These articles may or may not be in scope, and thus dangerous. Please verify.