Difference between revisions of "WikiProject stuff/WikiProject mainpage/Assessment"

A fragment of the Garden of Remembering
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Let's just put this here so nothing gets forgottenlike)
 
(Experimenting with shorter text)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<pre>
<includeonly>{{#CSS:
EXPLANATORY BLURB
.assess-cat,
.assess-dis,
.assess-file,
.assess-re,
.assess-temp,
.assess-na {
display: none;
}
}}</includeonly>{{wpModule
|title= Assessments
|intro=
In order to prioritise work, articles within the scope of the project need to be assessed for quality and importance to the project's scope. At present, 42i of ERR_INSUFFICIENT_SPACE articles have been assessed.


SHORT TABLE/LONG TABLE of current status stuff
The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{[[#|project banner]]}} template.
|aside=
{{wpActionbox
|title= Help out
|buttons=
{{wpButton|Assess random}}
{{wpButton|Join queue}}
{{wpButton|type=progressive|Offer soul}}
}}
|content=


THINGS TO ASSESS
quality
importance to project scope
in scope at all


STUFF RELATEDISH (categories that would help with workflow?)
{{wpSubheader1|Overview of assessment status}}
</pre>
<general stuff, more info, yadda>
<noinclude>
<A lot more stuff and info></noinclude>
{{:WikiProject_stuff/WikiProject_mainpage/Assessment/statistics}}
 
{{wpSubheader1|Articles to assess}}
{{wpColumn list
|width=20em
|content=
{{wpColumn list item
|title= Assess for quality
|blurb= These articles are of unknown quality and require eyes.
|content=
{{wpList item|[[#|Giant squid]]}}
{{wpList item|[[#|Three-eyed squid]]}}
{{wpList item|[[#|Cuttlefish squid]]}}
{{wpList item|[[The eyes]]}}
|after={{wpAll|link=#}}
}}
{{wpColumn list item
|title= Assess for importance
|blurb = Please rate these according to how dire the consequences would be were they neglected.
|content=
{{wpList item|[[#|Aboleth]]}}
{{wpList item|[[#|Colossal squid]]}}
{{wpList item|[[#|Act of screaming]]}}
{{wpList item|[[#|Fibre]]}}
|after={{wpAll|link=#}}
}}
{{wpColumn list item
|title= Assess for Scope
|blurb= These articles may or may not be in scope.
|content=
{{wpList item|[[#|Gasdsthoshis]]}}
{{wpList item|[[#|Beholder (creature)]]}}
{{wpList item|[[#|Sample]]}}
{{wpList item|[[#|The Librarian]]}}
|after={{wpAll|link=#}}
}}
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 16:42, 2 July 2015

Help out

Assess random
Join queue
Offer soul
In order to prioritise work, articles within the scope of the project need to be assessed for quality and importance to the project's scope. At present, 42i of ERR_INSUFFICIENT_SPACE articles have been assessed. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{project banner}} template.

Overview of assessment status

<general stuff, more info, yadda>

<A lot more stuff and info>

Old Ones articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 4 16 29 5 1 55
FL 2 2
A 3 8 10 21
GA 6 25 40 97 168
B 14 49 123 206 1 393
C 26 152 313 478 80 1,049
Start 52 507 1,832 5,458 1 977 8,827
Stub 2 76 871 7,070 51 2,440 10,510
List 2 6 23 113 72 98 314
Category 1 3 12 4,700 4,716
Disambig 13 289 302
File 596 596
Redirect 1 14 86 101
Template 2 2 732 736
Other 22 22
Assessed 106 837 3,243 13,480 6,550 3,596 27,812
Unassessed 56 40 960 1,056
Total 106 837 3,243 13,536 6,590 4,556 28,868
WikiWork factors (?) total steps: 112,939 average: 5.37

Articles to assess

Assess for quality

These articles are of unknown quality and require eyes.

Assess for importance

Please rate these according to how dire the consequences would be were they neglected.

Assess for Scope

These articles may or may not be in scope.